Elizabeth Ewart, aged 55, died at The Melbourne Clinic on 27 February 2017. She had bipolar disorder, anxiety and schizoaffective disorder. After administering PRN Olanzapine 2.5mg at 4:35pm for agitation, Nurse Cook was approached by Ms Ewart (the sister) expressing serious concern about Lizzie's condition. Ms Ewart claims she told Cook Lizzie was in a 'terrible state' and wanted Dr T. called; Cook denies receiving this information and claims Ms Ewart only reported her as 'sleepy'. The inquest focused on whether Cook should have assessed Lizzie following family concerns. The coroner found the cause of death unascertained, making causation determination impossible. Despite Expert opinions that assessment should have occurred, the coroner could not definitively resolve the contradictory accounts on the balance of probabilities. No adverse findings were made against Cook. The case highlights gaps in psychiatric facility policies for monitoring patient physical wellbeing during routine visual observations, particularly when sedating medications are administered.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Administration of PRN Olanzapine without full physical assessment
Inadequate nursing assessment following family expression of concern
Visual observation policies not explicitly mandating physical wellbeing check
Possible medication-related central nervous system depression
Communication gap between sister's concerns and nursing response
Coroner's recommendations
The Chief Psychiatrist should formulate a directive prescribing a standard protocol/practice in all inpatient psychiatric facilities that visual observation of patients include not only full faced unequivocal identification but also screening for changes in presentation that may indicate an acute or developing medical condition, to ensure patient physical wellbeing.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —