Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Hizir Ferman

Deceased

Hizir Ferman

Demographics

35y, male

Coroner

Coroner Rosemary Carlin

Date of death

2016-07-28

Finding date

2019-07-05

Cause of death

Cardiorespiratory arrest in the setting of acute agitation and physical and chemical restraint

AI-generated summary

Hizir Ferman, aged 35, died at Middleton Prison following forcible extraction from his room by SESG officers using CS gas and physical restraint. He was held prone with hands cuffed behind him, a shield on his back, and additional downward pressure applied, initially in the bathroom for over six minutes, then positioned upright when moved outside. Post-mortem examination revealed cardiorespiratory arrest. The coroner found that hypoventilation from restraint in the prone position—compounded by prior violent struggle, CS gas exposure, and the terminal event of being sat upright—was the primary cause of death. Nursing staff failed to recognise his critically unconscious state, perform adequate assessment (blood pressure, oxygen saturation), or call an ambulance. Clinical lessons include: the danger of prone restraint with additional pressure, especially without medical assessment; failure to escalate care when patient is unconscious; inadequate communication between security and medical staff; lack of specific training for nurses on restraint asphyxia and cell extraction incidents.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

correctional healthemergency medicinerespiratory medicineforensic medicine

Error types

communicationsystemdelay

Clinical conditions

hypoventilationrestraint asphyxiapositional asphyxiapulmonary oedemagastric aspirationsubarachnoid haemorrhageintraventricular haemorrhagehypoxaemiahypercapnoeacerebral hypoxia

Procedures

CS gas deploymentcell extractionphysical restraintdecontaminationcardiopulmonary resuscitation

Contributing factors

  • Prolonged prone restraint with hands cuffed behind back
  • Shield applied to back with downward pressure applied at times
  • Inhalation of CS gas (tear gas)
  • Prior violent struggle leading to exhaustion and increased respiratory demand
  • Being positioned upright when already critically compromised
  • Fractured ribs (likely from struggle/restraint)
  • Possible excess mucous secretions from gas exposure
  • Lack of objective monitoring of restraint necessity and degree by team leader
  • Failure of nurses to recognise unconscious state and call ambulance

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Corrections Victoria should update SESG cell extraction training and manuals to incorporate matters raised in the coroner's comments regarding restraint asphyxia and operational safety
  2. Corrections Victoria should update its Critical Incident and Safety Management online training module on positional asphyxia to: use the term 'restraint related positional asphyxia'; include CS gas as a risk factor; provide clear guidance to place restrained person in recovery position as soon as safe; make clear it is dangerous to sit on or apply prolonged pressure to back or chest
  3. Corrections Victoria should review bedroom configuration at Middleton to assess means of allowing prison officers to view or enter bedrooms in emergencies, and modify one or more doors to insert a trap
  4. Corrections Victoria should ensure all SESG and medical staff receive enhanced training on dangers of prone restraint, particularly when combined with handcuffs, shields, or chest pressure
  5. Corrections Victoria should ensure all SESG and medical staff receive enhanced training on signs and symptoms of restraint related positional asphyxia, recognising it may develop insidiously without obvious signs of breathing difficulty
  6. Corrections Victoria should implement procedures requiring: logs of all communication attempts with prisoner before extraction; contemporaneous recording of reasons if proclamation is dispensed with; inclusion of medical staff in extraction planning; clear handover from SESG to medical staff documenting force, method, and duration of restraint; and monitoring by team leader of extraction and prisoner condition
  7. Corrections Victoria should nominate an alternate SESG team leader in advance of extraction and have process for replacing fatigued team members
  8. Corrections Victoria should ensure team leader actively monitors extraction and restraint, ensures prisoner placed in recovery position as soon as safe, and ensures prisoner medically reviewed as soon as possible after extraction
  9. Corrections Victoria should ensure all cell extractions have an emergency exit plan, particularly for use of chemical agents
  10. Corrections Victoria should implement policy that video operator for cell extractions be designated and assertive about obtaining clear views, including instructing others to step away if necessary
  11. Correct Care Australia should ensure medical staff are included in pre-extraction planning or fully briefed prior to extraction occurring
  12. Correct Care Australia should ensure medical staff allocate clear roles and devise plan of response including when to call ambulance; seek additional medical help before extraction if expertise may be needed
  13. Correct Care Australia should ensure medical staff undertake clinical assessments in accordance with Medical and Nursing Response Record form, which includes recording oxygen saturations and neurological observations
  14. Correct Care Australia should have the RESTRAINT AND POSITIONAL ASPHYXIA fact sheet reviewed by appropriately qualified medical practitioner, including: clarifying that inadequate ventilation leads to elevated CO2 which impairs conscious state; adding defaecation to list of signs; and reconsidering recommendation to place patient in upright position with head elevated as this appears contraindicated
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.