Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Trajce Laboski

Deceased

Trajce Laboski

Demographics

27y, male

Coroner

Coroner Caitlin English

Date of death

2015-11-10

Finding date

2019-06-26

Cause of death

Injuries sustained in descent from height

AI-generated summary

A 27-year-old man with schizophrenia was brought to Northern Hospital ED by police under Mental Health Act section 351 after threatening suicide and injecting testosterone. The Emergency Department doctor (Dr K.) assessed him, determined he needed psychiatric admission, but did not make a formal assessment order under section 30, relying on a Northern Hospital 'practice' where only mental health clinicians make such orders. Mr Laboski was then assessed by a mental health nurse (Ms Baker) in an unstaffed pink pod—acknowledged as inappropriate by the hospital. When told he would be admitted involuntarily, he became distressed and left the ED. He was found deceased the next morning near a construction site adjacent to the hospital. Key preventability issues: Dr K. had authority to make the assessment order and arguably should have when Mr Laboski lacked insight and had psychotic symptoms; the unstaffed pod placement was inappropriate and known to be so; staff withheld information from Mr Laboski to prevent absconding rather than securing him safely; the hospital and mental health services lacked integrated coordination and communication.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinepsychiatry

Error types

diagnosticproceduralcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

testosteronediazepamnordiazepamhydroxyrisperidoneolanzapine

Clinical conditions

schizophreniapsychosissuicidal ideationsubstance use history

Contributing factors

  • Failure by Emergency Department medical staff to make a section 30 assessment order despite having authority and clinical indications to do so
  • Inappropriate placement of patient in unstaffed pink pod for mental health assessment
  • Lack of communication and coordination between Northern Hospital ED and North Western Mental Health
  • Understaffing of mental health services with only one EMHC on duty overnight
  • Withholding information from patient about reason for waiting to maintain compliance rather than securing patient safely
  • Absence of direct supervision for EMHC
  • Patient's distress upon first being informed he would be admitted involuntarily
  • Presence of unsecured stacked pallets adjacent to construction site near ED exit
  • Proximity of construction site to ED exit

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Melbourne Health North Western Mental Health and Northern Hospital undertake a review of actual wait times for Emergency Department Mental Health clinician assessments, especially out of business hours, to establish if the two-hour reasonable wait time is being achieved and address sustained variances.
  2. Melbourne Health North Western Mental Health and Northern Hospital review the current service model of care for mental health patients in ED to identify opportunities to integrate patient care processes including: identify patient needs, increase communication of critical information, develop shared and comprehensive care planning, and prevent harm.
  3. Northern Hospital Emergency Department in consultation with North Western Mental Health review the contemporaneousness and appropriateness of the current practice that removes medical practitioner responsibilities under the Mental Health Act 2014 and assigns them to North Western Mental Health clinicians, informed by: escalation processes in ED, understanding of sections 28-30 of the Mental Health Act, understanding of Mental Health Act safeguards and patient rights, and advice from the Chief Psychiatrist regarding section 30 obligations.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.