Finding into death of Elizabeth Anne Palmer
Deceased
Elizabeth Anne Palmer
Demographics
39y, female
Date of death
2016-05-13
Finding date
2018-03-13
Cause of death
Hypovolaemic shock due to incised injury to the wrist
AI-generated summary
A 39-year-old woman with a history of mental health issues and previous suicide attempts was admitted to a high-dependency psychiatric unit following a suicide attempt involving razor blades and medications. She was placed on a Temporary Treatment Order and her belongings were searched on admission. A Kindle device was not thoroughly examined—the cover was not removed to check for concealed dangerous items. The following day, her husband informed her he would not reconcile their marriage. Shortly after, she accessed a razor blade she had secreted in the Kindle cover, used it to self-harm fatally, and died from hypovolaemic shock. The coroner found the search was inadequate given her high risk of self-harm and the High Dependency Unit context. The hospital initially resisted but later conceded the Kindle should have been removed from its cover. This case highlights the importance of thorough searches of all items, including electronic devices, in high-risk psychiatric inpatients.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Inadequate search of patient belongings on admission to high-dependency psychiatric unit
- Failure to thoroughly examine Kindle device, including removal of cover
- Razor blade concealed in Kindle cover not discovered during admission search
- Distressing personal information (marital breakdown) conveyed to patient during admission
- Interval between nursing observations allowed patient opportunity to access concealed weapon
Coroner's recommendations
- The Chief Psychiatrist should issue a revised guideline in relation to search policy for compulsory patients in high-dependency units, to the effect that electronic devices such as Kindles be subject to thorough examination as part of the search process
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —