Deceased
Wilhelm Paul Koeppen
Demographics
46y, male
Date of death
1976-02-29
Finding date
2018-07-11
Cause of death
unknown causes, suspected homicide
AI-generated summary
Wilhelm Paul Koeppen, a 46-year-old celebrity chef, disappeared on 29 February 1976 after leaving a doctor's residence in the early morning hours. His body was never located. The coroner found he died on or about that date from unknown causes, suspected to be homicide. Extensive police investigations over four decades failed to identify the responsible parties. No clinical lessons are applicable as this case involves a suspected criminal homicide with no medical or healthcare-related factors contributing to the death.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Male, female, male, female·Nicholas Brown: combined drug (methadone and benzodiazepine) intoxication; Toni …
Joint inquest into four deaths of individuals prescribed opioid replacement therapy by Dr J. between September 2016 and August 2017: Nicholas Shane Brown (35), Toni Lee Wiki (38), Matthew Wayne Winwood (47), and Belinda …
40y · Male·Unascertained
Nathan James Taylor, aged 40, died in Port Lincoln Prison on 24 March 2022 while in custody pending trial on witness interference charges. He had significant medical history including infective endocarditis with tricuspi…
56y · Male·Unascertained
John William Swiety, 56, disappeared on 17 March 2023 in bushland near Goongerah, Victoria, after traveling with Daniel Harrison. Harrison's account contains significant inconsistencies and omissions. Although charged wi…
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —