Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of Rohan Grindrod

Deceased

Rohan Grindrod

Demographics

41y, male

Coroner

Coroner Caitlin English

Date of death

2011-11-16

Finding date

2018-06-06

Cause of death

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP)

AI-generated summary

Rohan Grindrod, a 41-year-old man with acquired brain injury and epilepsy following a 2007 motor vehicle accident, died of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) at his home on 16-17 November 2011. He had a Personal Emergency Response (VitalCall) device that had previously saved his life approximately 30 times. When relocating from King Street to Adrian Drive, the VitalCall device was physically moved but not reconnected or reactivated. The coroner found that although it was highly unlikely Mr Grindrod could have self-activated the device even if connected (given his cognitive impairment and the nature of SUDEP), systemic failures occurred: TAC case management services failed to include the VitalCall device in the move planning; State Trustees did not flag it despite knowing of its importance; Vista staff received no directive about it; and VitalCall provided inadequate warnings about the consequences of disconnection. The coroner found no causation between the device non-reconnection and death itself, but identified preventable system failures in the coordination of essential medical equipment during vulnerable transitions.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

neurologyoccupational therapyemergency medicineforensic medicine

Error types

systemcommunicationdelay

Drugs involved

carbamazepinephenytoincannabis

Clinical conditions

epilepsyacquired brain injurysudden unexpected death in epilepsy (sudep)cardiomegalycardiac fibrosiscoronary artery atherosclerosis

Contributing factors

  • Moderate acquired brain injury from 2007 motor vehicle accident
  • Poorly controlled epilepsy with frequent seizures
  • Non-compliance with anticonvulsant medication
  • Personal Emergency Response device (VitalCall) not reconnected at new address
  • Failure of case management services to include VitalCall device in move planning
  • Lack of coordination between TAC, State Trustees, and Vista regarding equipment transfer
  • Inadequate warnings from VitalCall manufacturer regarding disconnection consequences
  • No risk assessment performed during case management planning for move
  • Deceased lived alone at new address with flatmate absent during critical period
  • Cannabis use (recent, detected at autopsy)

Coroner's recommendations

  1. VitalCall to contact all users with similar devices, clearly warning that disconnection from telephone or power may cause device failure and that technician transfer is required
  2. VitalCall to provide warning stickers clearly stating devices are not to be disconnected and advising contacting VitalCall for transfer
  3. VitalCall to update all user literature (guides and brochures) to include clear warnings about disconnection consequences and need for technician transfer
  4. TAC to write to all users of VitalCall devices warning about dangers of disconnection and advising technician transfer is required
  5. TAC to include or require risk assessment when providing case management services (internal or outsourced) for any task requiring case management
  6. TAC to implement 'hot note' warning or flag on electronic systems if not already done to alert staff when client has Personal Emergency Response device
  7. TAC, State Trustees, and Vista to conduct review ensuring all clients with lifesaving equipment are recorded on electronic systems so equipment is identified as risk requiring evaluation upon any change in circumstances such as change of address
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.