Lauren Pilkington, a 20-year-old postgraduate student, died by asphyxia from helium inhalation. She had a history of anxiety and previous suicide attempt, and was recently discharged from voluntary psychiatric admission at Delmont Private Hospital on 8 August 2016 after treatment for major depressive episode and generalised anxiety disorder. At discharge, the treating psychiatrist did not consider her high risk despite passive suicidal ideation. She declined the recommended day program due to logistics. Within 16 days of discharge, she purchased equipment and took her own life. Clinical lessons include: recognising that passive suicidal ideation, even without active plans, warrants closer follow-up; ensuring early post-discharge appointments rather than booking three weeks out; understanding that apparent mood improvement may mask underlying risk; and considering structured outpatient programs essential rather than optional. The easy availability of helium remained unaddressed.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Severe anxiety worsening after relocation to Melbourne
Recently diagnosed major depressive episode
Self-imposed academic pressure
Social isolation in new city
Living alone
Breakup with long-distance boyfriend
Academic stress and assignment pressure
Easy access to helium gas
Passive suicidal ideation present at discharge
Coroner's recommendations
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission should consider working to restrict the ease of access to helium gas by members of the Australian public
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —