Left middle cerebral artery territory ischaemic stroke
AI-generated summary
A 41-year-old registered nurse presented to the Emergency Department with altered consciousness on 28 May 2015. She was initially assessed as having a possible medication overdose rather than acute stroke, despite later learning she had reported weakness on her right side and suspected stroke that morning. A CT brain was not ordered initially; it was performed 8+ hours after presentation (8:21 pm), confirming a large left middle cerebral artery territory infarction. Emergency physician expert opinion concluded that medical management was sub-optimal because necessary investigations to confirm overdose or exclude stroke were not sufficiently thorough. However, even if stroke had been identified earlier, a neurologist's unchallenged opinion confirmed the patient was ineligible for thrombolysis due to uncertain time of symptom onset and extensive infarction on CT. The coroner found the failure to obtain timely CT was a regrettable deficiency but not a causal factor in death, since thrombolysis was contraindicated regardless. Peninsula Health conceded a CT should have been ordered earlier given diagnostic uncertainty.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
emergency medicineneurologyradiologyintensive care
Failure to obtain timely CT scan of brain despite altered conscious state of unknown cause
Incomplete initial neurological assessment
Inadequate differential diagnosis investigation
Lack of collateral history at time of initial assessment
Misattribution of altered conscious state to medication overdose
Coroner's recommendations
In the event that an adequate collateral history cannot be obtained, where a clear cause for the altered conscious state cannot be determined, and stroke cannot be excluded, then consideration should be given for an urgent CT scan to be conducted by Peninsula Health medical clinicians
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.