Finding into death of Peter Van Danh
Deceased
Peter Van Danh
Demographics
36y, male
Date of death
2014-09-11
Finding date
2017-03-22
Cause of death
Head injuries from motor vehicle strike
AI-generated summary
Peter Van Danh, a 36-year-old man, died on 11 September 2014 from head injuries consistent with being struck by a motor vehicle. He had consumed approximately 40 diazepam tablets and tested positive for methamphetamine, morphine, codeine, and cannabis. On the evening of his death, he engaged in violent altercations with his partner, attended a Centrelink office appearing intoxicated, and was later found on Prior Road with fatal head injuries. Despite extensive police investigation, no person or vehicle responsible for his death has been identified. The case highlights risks associated with substance intoxication, inadequate vigilance, and the challenges of identifying hit-and-run incidents in community settings.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Contributing factors
- Acute intoxication with multiple psychoactive substances
- Ingestion of approximately 40 diazepam tablets
- Presence of methamphetamine, morphine, codeine, and cannabis
- Impaired judgment and reduced responsiveness to danger
- Sitting in middle of road in semi-conscious state
- Poor visibility and dark conditions
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —