Finding into death of Moustafa Elakkoumi
Deceased
MOUSTAFA ELAKKOUMI
Demographics
19y, male
Date of death
2015-05-30
Finding date
2016-12-14
Cause of death
Injuries sustained in motor vehicle collision (driver)
AI-generated summary
Moustafa Elakkoumi, a 19-year-old learner driver, was fatally injured when his vehicle collided with a tree following a brief police interception attempt. He was driving unlicensed with five teenage passengers, one of whom had cannabis. After police activated emergency lights for a routine speed check, Moustafa panicked and accelerated to 120-130 km/h through a roundabout in a 60 km/h zone. He lost control on a curve, skidding into a tree at 38-58 km/h. Police immediately deactivated lights upon recognising dangerous driving conditions and did not pursue. No mechanical defects were found. The coroner found no culpability by police and determined Moustafa was not in custody. Key clinical lessons: trauma management in high-speed MVA with multiple casualties; management of head injuries, spinal fractures, and severe trauma in young patients.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- speeding in 60 km/h zone (90-100 km/h initial speed)
- driver panic upon police interception
- acceleration to 120-130 km/h after police lights activated
- loss of control through roundabout
- failure to brake adequately before curve
- vehicle skid and impact with tree
- learner driver operating without licensed supervisor
- multiple teenage passengers in vehicle
- cannabis use by at least one passenger
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —