Finding into death of Dianne Kaye Quinlan
Deceased
Dianne Kaye Quinlan
Demographics
51y, female
Date of death
2014-08-18
Finding date
2016-07-28
Cause of death
Pulmonary thromboembolism in the setting of morbid obesity
AI-generated summary
Ms Quinlan, a 51-year-old woman with morbid obesity (BMI 74.2), depression, bipolar disorder and recent diabetes diagnosis, died from pulmonary thromboembolism while an involuntary psychiatric inpatient. She presented with leg pain and swelling in May 2014; ultrasound was technically difficult due to body habitus and didn't identify DVT, though she was advised to pursue arterial Doppler follow-up which she didn't complete. On admission to psychiatric care in August, she exhibited respiratory symptoms and shortness of breath on exertion, but these weren't investigated for thromboembolic disease. Clinical lessons: obesity significantly increases VTE risk and complicates imaging; respiratory symptoms in obese patients warrant VTE consideration; technical ultrasound limitations should prompt alternative imaging; and psychiatric patients require concurrent medical assessment, particularly when new respiratory symptoms emerge during admission.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Drugs involved
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Morbid obesity (BMI 74.2)
- Immobility during psychiatric admission
- Failure to pursue recommended arterial Doppler follow-up after May 2014 presentation
- Respiratory symptoms not investigated for thromboembolic disease
- Sedating psychiatric medications
- Deep venous thrombosis of both legs
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —