A 99-year-old man with cognitive decline sustained a hip fracture from a fall and subsequently underwent surgery with informed consent. He suffered cardiopulmonary arrest post-operatively and was resuscitated despite the son's claim he had previously expressed NFR wishes. No formal NFR order existed at the time of collapse. The coroner found the patient had capacity to consent to surgery, the resuscitation was legally appropriate given absence of formal NFR documentation, and communication with family about medical management should have been more proactive. The hospital implemented comprehensive policy improvements post-incident addressing Medical Power of Attorney documentation and NFR procedures. Key clinical lessons: proactively discuss resuscitation/NFR status with elderly post-operative patients and their families; formally document advance directives; ensure Medical Power of Attorney status is identified at admission; and consider family input even when patient has capacity.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
general medicineorthopaedic surgerygeriatric medicineanaesthesia
Error types
communicationsystem
Clinical conditions
hip fracture (neck of femur)pneumoniadementiacognitive declinecardiopulmonary arrestrib fractures
Procedures
open reduction and internal fixation of hip fracturecardiopulmonary resuscitationcomputed tomography scanX-raymagnetic resonance imaging
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.