Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Chien Diu Hoang

Deceased

Chien Diu Hoang

Demographics

28y, male

Date of death

2011-06-12

Finding date

2016-08-31

Cause of death

stab wound to the neck with penetration and laceration of the right subclavian artery, resulting in massive blood loss, cardiorespiratory arrest, and irreversible brain injury

AI-generated summary

Chien Diu Hoang, a 28-year-old Vietnamese student, died from a stab wound to the neck inflicted during a nightclub altercation in Melbourne in June 2011. The death was ruled a homicide. Mr Hoang had purchased a screwdriver before attending the nightclub where a fight broke out between two groups. He was stabbed by Minh Thao Nguyen, who subsequently fled to Vietnam. Despite an extensive police investigation, no charges were laid against the identified assailant. The autopsy revealed the fatal wound penetrated the right subclavian artery causing massive blood loss and cardiorespiratory arrest. Toxicology detected amphetamine and methamphetamine in his blood. This case demonstrates the challenges in prosecuting homicides when the accused flees jurisdiction, and highlights circumstances of violent injury requiring emergency trauma management.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • violent altercation at nightclub
  • possession of screwdriver by victim
  • knife possessed by assailant
  • nighttime venue with alcohol consumption context
  • inter-group conflict
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —