An 18-year-old woman with major depressive disorder and PTSD was admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit after expressing suicidal ideation and self-harm. She was changed from involuntary to voluntary status after clinical review. Four days later, she was found hanging in her bathroom using the bathroom door hooks as a suspension point and a thin fabric (possibly a bed sheet) as a ligature. Despite resuscitation efforts, she died from hypoxic brain injury. The coroner found that clinical management was reasonable, but identified systemic failures: hooks/housing posed an unacceptable hanging risk, safety audit processes failed to identify this, and a risk management report should have been completed when a co-patient disclosed a prior hanging attempt using the same hooks. Key lessons include the importance of comprehensive environmental safety assessment, documented risk escalation procedures, and interdisciplinary communication between inpatient and outpatient teams managing complex patients with chronic suicidality.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Bathroom door hooks/housing designed for wall mounting but installed on psychiatric facility bathroom doors posed an unacceptable hanging risk
Failure of internal safety audit processes to identify the unacceptable risk posed by hooks/housing
Inadequate risk management documentation following a co-patient's prior hanging attempt using the same hooks
Discrepant risk assessments between outpatient and inpatient teams regarding acuity of suicidal risk
Breakdown in communication regarding safety concerns about hooks/housing raised by staff but not formally escalated
Coroner's recommendations
The Chief Psychiatrist should consider mandating the removal of the particular hook/housing used in the Orygen inpatient unit, particularly from doors or any other placement where they can be utilised as a hanging or suspension point.
Orygen Youth Health/Melbourne Health should develop a procedure that addresses the need for scene preservation and/or recording, in circumstances where a serious suicide attempt has taken place in an inpatient facility, in anticipation of a foreseeable coronial investigation.
Such a procedure should identify roles and responsibilities as clearly as possible, in particular as regards the completion of RiskMan reports of the incident or any other tool or software being used from time to time in the health service to manage risk.
The health service should contact the court for information regarding a guideline being developed by the Chief Commissioner of Police to assist health services with scene preservation procedures.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —