Finding into death of Gregory Jon Andrews
Deceased
Gregory Jon Andrews
Demographics
50y, male
Date of death
2008-10-08
Finding date
2016-04-20
Cause of death
multiple crush injuries to the neck and chest in a workplace accident
AI-generated summary
Gregory Jon Andrews, a 50-year-old truck driver, died from multiple crush injuries when his crane truck overturned while unloading coils from a semi-trailer on a Melbourne street. The truck tipped because the left-side stabiliser leg was not fully extended, inadequate wooden blocks supported the foot pads, and he operated the crane from between the two vehicles. Critical systemic failures included: lack of proper licensing (Andrews had no Vehicle Loading Crane licence despite regulations requiring one), absence of a Safe Work Method Statement, no trained spotter assigned, and working alone with complex hydraulic machinery. The coroner found the death preventable due to failures by both his employer TCB Trans and site controller Buildcorp. Key preventable factors were inadequate operator training/licensing, failure to extend stabilisers properly, positioning between vehicles (obstructing escape), and failure to utilise a spotter or request assistance when the planned tail-to-tail unload became impossible.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Contributing factors
- lack of proper licensing for crane operation
- operator not holding required Vehicle Loading Crane (CV) licence
- inadequate operator training or familiarisation
- inadequate wooden blocks under stabiliser foot pads
- left-side stabiliser leg not fully extended
- operator positioned between two vehicles
- absence of Safe Work Method Statement
- absence of Job Safety Analysis
- failure to assign trained spotter to assist
- operating crane alone without second person
- poor site planning and preparation
- lack of proper traffic management
- private vehicle blocking intended unloading position
- cramped site conditions preventing safe stabiliser extension
- disabled Electronic Lifting Moment Limiting Device on crane
- inadequate maintenance records
Coroner's recommendations
- TCB Trans Pty Ltd implement a policy that two employees be assigned for work where crane truck use is anticipated, or alternatively that a suitably trained spotter always be available to assist on site
- Fassi include in the Use and Maintenance manual 170A.22 a recommendation that a spotter should always be available to the operator of the crane
- WorkSafe issue Safety Alerts on a regular and periodic basis, and not only in response to a fatality, on the dangers of operating hydraulic cranes, including recommendations that a spotter always be available
- Parliament of Victoria expressly incorporate the requirement of appropriate staffing or availability of a spotter into section 27 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (designers of plant)
- Parliament of Victoria expressly incorporate the requirement of appropriate staffing or availability of a spotter into section 29 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (manufacturers of plant)
- Parliament of Victoria expressly incorporate the requirement of appropriate staffing or availability of a spotter into section 30 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (suppliers of plant)
- Parliament of Victoria expressly incorporate the requirement of considering appropriate staffing or availability of a spotter into Part 3.5 or Part 3.6 of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2007 (as alternative to amending the Act)
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —