Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Neil Alfred Middling

Deceased

NEIL ALFRED MIDDLING

Demographics

70y, male

Date of death

2014-07-29

Finding date

2015-06-04

Cause of death

Metastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma

AI-generated summary

Mr Middling, a 70-year-old man imprisoned for sexual offences, died from metastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma on 29 July 2014 at St John's inpatient unit within Port Phillip Prison. He had been diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the stomach and lower oesophagus in April 2010 and received surgery and chemotherapy before imprisonment. After cancer recurrence was identified in February 2014, he elected not to pursue further chemotherapy due to side effects and poor prognosis, instead opting for symptom management and palliative care. A Not For Resuscitation order was appropriately established in consultation with his son. Following his final admission on 18 July 2014 with lethargy and nausea, he remained stable until he was found unresponsive on 29 July 2014. The coroner concluded the medical care provided by Port Phillip Prison staff was satisfactory, and his death resulted from the natural progression of advanced metastatic cancer.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • advanced metastatic cancer with poor prognosis
  • patient decision to decline further chemotherapy
  • palliative care approach with symptom management

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Port Phillip Prison to review its management of prisoner's next of kin details
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —