Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of AJR

Deceased

AJR

Demographics

88y, male

Date of death

2013-05-08

Finding date

2015-09-22

Cause of death

Multiple injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision (pedestrian)

AI-generated summary

An 88-year-old man died from multiple injuries sustained when struck by a motor vehicle while crossing a poorly-lit road as a pedestrian. He suffered bilateral pelvic fractures, lumbar spine fractures, aortic transection, haemopneumothorax, and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Despite emergency surgery including pelvic fixation and aortic repair, he developed bilateral subdural haematomas. The neurosurgical team determined that given the extent of his injuries, aggressive management was futile. He was palliated and died. The coroner found that poor street lighting on Clarinda Road likely contributed to the collision. This case highlights the importance of environmental factors in injury prevention and the need for adequate lighting in pedestrian crossing areas, particularly where elderly residents access public transport.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • poor street lighting on Clarinda Road
  • inadequate wattage of street lights (80W instead of minimum 150W for arterial roads)
  • darkness at time of collision
  • advanced age and frailty of deceased
  • limited visibility for pedestrians crossing the road

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Upgrade street lighting on Clarinda Road to minimum 150W as per Australian design standards
  2. Installation of additional street lighting as part of planned Dingley Bypass Project works
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —