Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of Daniel Paul Sheehy

Deceased

Daniel Paul Sheehy

Demographics

18y, male

Date of death

2012-03-14

Finding date

2015-02-19

Cause of death

Effects of fire (accidental)

AI-generated summary

Daniel Sheehy, a 18-year-old male, died from burns sustained in a bedroom fire on 14 March 2012. The coroner found the fire was accidental, most likely caused by a carelessly discarded or improperly extinguished cigarette on the bed while Daniel was smoking. Despite threats from individuals prior to the fire, forensic evidence excluded foul play or deliberate ignition. Daniel had methamphetamine and cannabis metabolites detected post-mortem. The critical clinical lesson is that intense fires create extreme rescue barriers; however, the case also highlights how substance use (methamphetamine) may impair judgment and situational awareness in crisis situations. The coincidence of the fire occurring on the night Daniel feared a home invasion complicated the family's acceptance, but scientific evidence definitively supported accidental causation.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • smoking in bed
  • carelessly discarded or improperly extinguished cigarette
  • methamphetamine use
  • cannabis use
  • flammable bedding and bedroom contents
  • bedroom door as physical barrier to escape
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —