Finding into death of Terence Bernard and Christine Elizabeth Hodson
Deceased
Terence Bernard Hodson and Christine Elizabeth Hodson
Demographics
56y, male
Date of death
2004-05-16
Finding date
2015-07-31
Cause of death
Gunshot wounds to the head
AI-generated summary
Terence and Christine Hodson were discovered shot dead in execution-style killings at their home in Kew, Victoria on 16 May 2004. The coroner investigated whether police informer Terence Hodson's death was connected to his role as a crown witness against suspended detective Paul Dale regarding a burglary. While evidence suggested Mr Dale may have had motive (fearing Hodson's testimony), the coroner found the key prosecution witness, notorious criminal Carl Williams, lacked sufficient credibility and was offered substantial inducements. The alleged meeting between Dale and Williams at Hillside was not adequately corroborated. The coroner noted that Hodson declined witness protection despite multiple offers, ignored security warnings about using his vulnerable rear television room, failed to maintain his gate security, and likely had dogs compromised by the killer. The coroner concluded the murders remain unsolved and could not determine on the balance of probabilities who was responsible.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Declined witness protection programme despite multiple offers
- Failed to heed police warnings about vulnerability of rear television room
- Gate security not maintained at time of attack
- Dogs may have been overcome or compromised by killer
- Continued involvement in drug trafficking
- No CCTV coverage of most likely point of entry via adjoining property
- Identity as police informer became known to criminal underworld
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —