Coronial
VICmental health

Finding into death of David John McLeod

Deceased

David John McLeod

Demographics

58y, male

Date of death

2012-08-26

Finding date

2014-12-23

Cause of death

Cardiomegaly and severe single vessel coronary artery atherosclerosis in a man with schizoaffective disorder

AI-generated summary

David John McLeod, a 58-year-old man with schizoaffective disorder, was admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit on 21 August 2012 following mental health deterioration. He presented with signs of infection, received appropriate clinical assessment and investigations (blood tests, chest x-ray, ECG), and was managed with antibiotics. He collapsed four days later and died from cardiomegaly and severe single vessel coronary artery atherosclerosis. Investigation focused on whether urinary incontinence represented a new symptom requiring investigation versus pre-existing chronic incontinence. Although medical records showed conflicting information about post-operative urinary status after recent prostate surgery, the coroner found medical and nursing care was appropriate and consistent with standard care. The death resulted from acute cardiac pathology unrelated to any clinical management failures.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Pre-existing coronary artery disease
  • Cardiomegaly
  • Sudden cardiac event
  • Recent infection
  • Heavy smoking history
  • Multiple comorbid conditions including COAD, hypercholesterolaemia
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —