Mikael Rohan, a 14-year-old with a history of separation anxiety, attachment disorder, and sleep disturbance, died after stepping in front of a train on 16 November 2010. He had recently been distressed about a reported pregnancy with a girlfriend and experienced a rapid deterioration following his girlfriend ending their relationship. His presentation to Monash on 9 November 2010 with suicidal ideation was assessed by a psychiatric nurse (Nurse Sebille) rather than a child and adolescent psychiatrist as requested by his GP. The assessment was rated as low risk and discharged. Care became fragmented when Dr O.'s treatment was terminated in favour of Headspace counselling. Clinicians did not utilise adequate senior psychiatric review of an adolescent in crisis. The coroner noted that terminating the established therapeutic relationship with Dr O. may have removed a stabilising influence during a high-risk period, though acknowledged the complexity of predicting suicide risk in adolescents.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
inadequate senior psychiatric review of crisis assessment performed by adult mental health nurse
fragmentation of care with termination of established psychiatric relationship
insufficient family engagement in care coordination decisions
rapid escalation of risk in 5-day period preceding death
limited time window between first clear risk presentation and completed suicide
adolescent's difficulty with risk assessment reliability
relationship breakdown shortly before death
Coroner's recommendations
Monash Medical Centre should review its Crisis Assessment Review policies to require an experienced Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist to review adolescent crisis assessments, particularly those undertaken by adult mental health clinicians, before clinical decisions regarding admission, treatment or discharge are made
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.