Ligature compression of the neck in circumstances of being hanged
AI-generated summary
Adam Omerovic, a 40-year-old man with a long history of depression, substance abuse, and prior suicide attempts, died by hanging in a Melbourne Assessment Prison cell on 23 March 2010. He had been remanded on armed robbery charges and was classified as P1 (serious psychiatric condition requiring intensive care) and S2 (significant suicide risk) on admission. Despite this high-risk classification and evidence of recent suicidal ideation, he was not reviewed by any psychiatrist or psychiatric registrar during his 6-day remand. Instead, RPN-level staff conducted brief 'here and now' mental state assessments focused on transfer rather than diagnosis or treatment. He was transferred from protective Muirhead observation cells to a non-BDRP compliant general prison cell after only 2 days, where he was found hanged from a shower screen. The coroner found systemic failures: protocols mandating psychiatrist review of P1/P2 prisoners were circumvented by informal directives prioritising rapid throughput; critical clinical information (prior ITO, suicide threats, medication history) was not made available to reviewing staff; and the focus on brief assessments prevented longitudinal evaluation needed for diagnosis and medication. The lack of safe cell options and resource constraints contributed but did not excuse the deviation from established protocols.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Failure to review P1-classified prisoner by psychiatrist or psychiatric registrar despite protocols requiring such review
Brief 'here and now' mental state assessments by RPNs instead of longitudinal psychiatric evaluation
Systemic diversion from established protocols due to resource constraints and throughput pressures
Incomplete information transfer: prior ITO, suicide threat to prison officer, prior psychiatric reviews, and collateral information not available to reviewing RPNs
Premature transfer from protective Muirhead cell (48 hours) to non-BDRP compliant general prison cell without psychiatric review
Placement in non-BDRP compliant cell with multiple hanging points despite high suicide risk classification
Absence of psychiatrist involvement in medication and diagnostic decisions
Informal oral directives from senior psychiatrists circumventing written protocols
Prisoner's rational presentation leading to underestimation of risk by non-specialist staff
Inadequate collateral information collection and communication between assessment points
Resource limitations: insufficient psychiatrist hours, limited BDRP-compliant cells at time of death
Coroner's recommendations
Forensicare seek additional funding for one full-time equivalent psychiatric consultant (or two part-time) at MAP, specifically to review and medically manage all P1 and P2 classified prisoners (psychotic or not) until safe transfer from Unit 13 and BDRP-compliant cells
Arrangements be made for MAP Forensicare staff to visit and review recently renovated BDRP-compliant cells so they are fully aware of changes and conditions
Arrangements be made for MAP Forensicare staff to visit Port Phillip Prison's Scarborough South Reception Unit to understand conditions in non-BDRP compliant cells into which at-risk prisoners may be transferred
Current P1 classification criteria be extended to include prisoners for pre-sentence/pre-trial psychiatric reports at AAU; review whether such prisoners can be safely detained in BDRP-compliant cells adjacent to Unit 13; all other P1 prisoners with serious psychiatric conditions be referred directly to AAU or adjacent BDRP unit for assessment and provisional diagnosis by nurse practitioner under consultant supervision or psychiatric registrar; all P2 prisoners be referred for medication review; and all Forensicare staff receive ongoing instruction on admission screening and Muirhead cell review including guidance on collateral information collection
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —