Multi-system failure complicating intra-operative haemorrhage due to inadvertent superior mesenteric artery ligation during laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
AI-generated summary
Robert Vivian Hawkins, a 55-year-old man, died from multi-system failure following inadvertent ligation of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) during laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Dr Jonathan Lewin misidentified the SMA for the left renal artery and applied insufficient clipping. Although he recognized the error and converted to open surgery, requesting senior surgical assistance, the bowel became ischaemic. The patient was transferred to Albury Hospital ICU then St Vincent's Hospital where vascular surgeons attempted SMA re-vascularization, but multi-organ failure supervened and the patient died. The inquest examined whether earlier conversion to open surgery, earlier SMA re-vascularization, Dr Lewin's qualifications to perform unsupervised laparoscopic nephrectomy, and the appropriateness of performing the procedure at Wodonga Hospital were issues. The coroner found no criticism warranted in most respects, accepting that vessel misidentification can occur despite competence, that deferring re-vascularization pending transfer was reasonable given the patient's instability and lack of vascular surgery expertise locally, and that Dr Lewin's qualifications met competency standards despite having performed fewer than 40 procedures.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
urologygeneral surgeryvascular surgeryintensive care
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.