Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Stephen Arthur Niit

Deceased

Stephen Arthur Nit

Demographics

45y, male

Date of death

2009-12-23

Finding date

2014-03-18

Cause of death

Hanging

AI-generated summary

Stephen Arthur Nit, a 45-year-old paramedic with a history of alcoholism, was placed in police custody in intoxicated state after a family dispute. Despite expressing suicidal ideation to mental health staff and police, he was not assessed for suicide risk or transferred to psychiatric care. Critically, recent suicidal statements made to Pine Lodge Clinic were not communicated to police. The required half-hourly checks for intoxicated detainees were not performed. The cell exercise yard had an accessible hanging point (door hinge), and Nit's dog collar was not removed when should have been. The coroner identified multiple failures in applying established procedures and identified inadequate communication between agencies.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • failure to communicate suicidal ideation expressed to Pine Lodge Clinic to police
  • failure to perform mandatory half-hourly checks on intoxicated detainee
  • failure to remove potential ligature points from cell and exercise yard
  • failure to remove dog collar that was fashioned into noose
  • leaving cell door open to exercise yard with accessible hanging point
  • distraction of police officer taking handover report at scene
  • allowing dog to accompany detainee in cell
  • limited information transfer from off-duty police officer to attending sergeants
  • unusual presentation of intoxicated person as jovial rather than aggressive reducing perceived risk
  • complacency in applying established custody procedures

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Eliminate all hanging points and ligature attachment points in police cells and exercise yards. Echuca exercise yard hinges should be replaced with anti-ligature design hinges; de-commission exercise yards if secure alternatives cannot be designed.
  2. Strictly enforce the Victoria Police Manual and Echuca Standard Operating Procedures for management of intoxicated detainees, with mandatory half-hourly personal checks and verbal rousing - no exceptions for compassionate reasons.
  3. Institute an 'alert' process to be widely broadcast and disseminated among Victoria Police members providing information about deaths and 'near-misses' in police custody, listing specific procedural failures to reinforce compliance, leaving nothing to discretion.
  4. Clarify to all Victoria Police members that intoxication is not a barrier to exercising Section 10 Mental Health Act powers or transferring a person to a mental health facility for assessment.
  5. Provide training and disseminate information about actual cases and consequences of non-compliance with custody procedures, emphasizing that tragic outcomes can occur during daily duties.
  6. Ensure protocols between Victoria Police and Department of Health clearly establish procedures for identifying vulnerable persons and that mental health information is promptly communicated when a person is in custody.
  7. Review and strengthen communication procedures between mental health facilities (like Pine Lodge Clinic) and police when a person expressing suicidal ideation comes into police custody.
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —