Coronial
VICmental health

Finding into death of Warren Guneratne

Deceased

Warren Guneratne

Demographics

25y, male

Date of death

2008-01-28

Finding date

2014-10-07

Cause of death

consistent with drowning in a man with multiple injuries

AI-generated summary

Warren Guneratne, a 25-year-old man with paranoid schizophrenia, was admitted involuntarily to the psychiatric unit of Royal Melbourne Hospital on 28 January 2008 after assessment by the Crisis Assessment and Treatment Team (CATT) revealed suicidal ideation with plan, paranoid delusions, and recent illicit drug use. He was admitted to the Low Dependency Unit (LDU) rather than the High Dependency Unit despite documented high-risk presentation. Critical communication failures occurred: the morning shift staff were not informed of the ECATT assessment, the patient's labile mood, or RPN Harris's advice that he might need HDU transfer if presentation changed. No psychiatric medical assessment was performed before he absconded approximately 6 hours post-admission. He left the unit, drove to the West Gate Bridge, and jumped to his death. The coroner found systemic breakdown in information exchange was unacceptable; a medical assessment performed promptly may have changed outcomes. Key lessons: risk assessment findings must be explicitly communicated to all treating staff, not just verbally conveyed; written documentation must be actively reviewed; early consultant psychiatric assessment is essential for involuntary admissions; and absconding notifications to police should be expedited when suicide risk is present.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • paranoid schizophrenia with labile mood
  • recent relapse with suicidal ideation and plan
  • recent illicit drug use (methamphetamine, cannabis)
  • non-compliance with antipsychotic medication
  • admission to low dependency unit despite high suicide risk
  • systemic communication failure regarding risk assessment
  • delay in psychiatric medical assessment (6 hours post-admission with none completed)
  • delay in notifying police of absconding (1 hour 15 minutes)
  • unlocked ward with unsecured exit points
  • inadequate handover of critical risk information to morning shift staff

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Review and develop clinical guidelines on risk assessment with particular reference to: significance of unknown patients; effect of recent drug use on mental health state; development of clinical prompts to escalate treatment plan
  2. Include clinical collateral documentation as part of admission notes, particularly for consumers from areas outside service catchment
  3. Review points of entry and egress within the ward and develop policy outlining when rear exit is accessible
  4. Review training on dual diagnosis issues and ensure staff trained in assessment of impact of drug and alcohol use on mental state and risk assessment
  5. Review policy on absence of inpatients to ensure risk assessment undertaken immediately when patient noted missing, consultant psychiatrist notified, and action plan instituted; all absent involuntary patients reported to police; medium to high risk patients reported to police regardless of legal status
  6. Heighten courtyard fence and secure gate to prevent absconding
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —