Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of Marcus Michael Christopher Charles

Deceased

Marcus Michael Christopher Charles

Demographics

0y, male

Coroner

Coroner Peter White

Date of death

2006-11-05

Finding date

2014-03-17

Cause of death

Complications of small bowel obstruction due to post operative adhesions

AI-generated summary

Marcus Charles, a 3-month-old neonate, died from small bowel obstruction due to postoperative adhesions following earlier surgical repair of oesophageal atresia and duodenal atresia. On 4 November 2006, paramedics attended after the mother reported vomiting but did not adequately elicit medical history, failed to recognise the significance of prior abdominal and thoracic surgery in a vomiting infant, and provided only an equivocal recommendation for hospital transfer. The mother expected transport to the Royal Children's Hospital. The coroner found the history-taking unsatisfactory, the physical examination inadequate (failing to note obvious surgical scarring the mother highlighted), and the recommendation insufficient given the clinical red flags. The coroner concluded that firm transport recommendation would have been accepted and that medical review at the hospital on 4 November would likely have resulted in successful outcome. Key failures included insufficient probing of medical history, failure to interpret vomiting in context of prior bowel and oesophageal surgery, inadequate documentation in the Patient Care Report, and insufficient assertion by paramedics given the clinical uncertainty.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicineparamedicinepaediatric surgeryneonatology

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationprocedural

Drugs involved

ranitidine

Clinical conditions

small bowel obstructionpostoperative adhesionsoesophageal atresiatrachea-oesophageal fistuladuodenal atresiavomitingpossible gastroenteritispicornavirus infection

Procedures

oesophageal atresia repairtrachea-oesophageal fistula ligationduodeno-duodenostomyautopsy

Contributing factors

  • Inadequate history-taking by paramedics regarding surgical history
  • Failure to recognise significance of vomiting in context of prior abdominal and thoracic surgery
  • Failure to note or consider relevance of visible surgical scarring
  • Inadequate physical examination
  • Equivocal recommendation for hospital transport rather than firm direction
  • Poor documentation in Patient Care Report
  • Inexperience with electronic Patient Care Report system
  • Possible viral gastroenteritis (picornavirus) triggering bowel obstruction
  • Postoperative adhesions from earlier surgery

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Education and training for ambulance officers regarding clinical knowledge of post-operative complications in infants
  2. Improved protocols for history-taking in complex paediatric cases, particularly regarding surgical history and significance of vomiting
  3. Standardised approach to obtaining discharge summaries or medical documentation when available at scene
  4. Emphasis on thorough physical examination, particularly noting visible surgical scarring
  5. Clear guidance on application of 'pay-off principle' in cases of clinical uncertainty
  6. Improvement of documentation systems in Patient Care Reports to record clinical decision-making
  7. Continued education as part of Ambulance Victoria's Continuing Education Program
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.