Finding into death of Marcus Michael Christopher Charles
Deceased
Marcus Michael Christopher Charles
Demographics
0y, male
Coroner
Coroner Peter White
Date of death
2006-11-05
Finding date
2014-03-17
Cause of death
Complications of small bowel obstruction due to post operative adhesions
AI-generated summary
Marcus Charles, a 3-month-old neonate, died from small bowel obstruction due to postoperative adhesions following earlier surgical repair of oesophageal atresia and duodenal atresia. On 4 November 2006, paramedics attended after the mother reported vomiting but did not adequately elicit medical history, failed to recognise the significance of prior abdominal and thoracic surgery in a vomiting infant, and provided only an equivocal recommendation for hospital transfer. The mother expected transport to the Royal Children's Hospital. The coroner found the history-taking unsatisfactory, the physical examination inadequate (failing to note obvious surgical scarring the mother highlighted), and the recommendation insufficient given the clinical red flags. The coroner concluded that firm transport recommendation would have been accepted and that medical review at the hospital on 4 November would likely have resulted in successful outcome. Key failures included insufficient probing of medical history, failure to interpret vomiting in context of prior bowel and oesophageal surgery, inadequate documentation in the Patient Care Report, and insufficient assertion by paramedics given the clinical uncertainty.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.