Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Rie Van Riel

Deceased

Rie van Riel

Demographics

89y, female

Date of death

2012-05-03

Finding date

2013-08-30

Cause of death

Multiple injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision as a pedestrian, with hypovolaemic shock from pelvic fractures

AI-generated summary

An 89-year-old woman died from multiple injuries sustained when struck by a motor vehicle while crossing Beach Road as a pedestrian. She was exiting a car park to access a nearby community centre when struck by a Toyota Camry travelling at approximately 10 km/h in wet weather conditions. The coroner found no suspicious circumstances and no medical factors contributing to the collision. The death was deemed a result of the traumatic injuries (pelvic fractures, rib fractures, and limb fractures) causing hypovolaemic shock. The coroner's only recommendation related to road safety infrastructure, recommending installation of a designated pedestrian crossing at this heavily-used location near the community facility.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • pedestrian crossed at non-designated location
  • wet road conditions limiting driver braking ability
  • heavy use of informal crossing point with inadequate infrastructure

Coroner's recommendations

  1. VicRoads should consider installation of a designated pedestrian crossing allowing patrons of Sandy Beach Centre to safely cross Beach Road from the B11 foreshore car park, opposite the Centre
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —