Coronial
VICcommunity

Finding into death of Stuart Beverley

Deceased

Stuart BEVERLEY

Demographics

31y, male

Date of death

2005-04-07

Finding date

2013-01-31

Cause of death

Hanging

AI-generated summary

A 31-year-old man with borderline personality disorder presented to mental health services after a suicide attempt on 30 March 2005, discharged after psychiatric assessment at Maroondah Hospital ED. Following several crisis presentations over the next week, he was briefly admitted involuntarily on 3 April 2005 but discharged the following day without medications or firm follow-up arrangements. Despite ongoing suicidal ideation, crisis team assessment on 6 April 2005 developed a community-based management plan. He died by hanging on 7 April 2005. The Coroner found insufficient evidence of clinical negligence or causal connection to his death. Key lesson: clinicians appropriately focused on longitudinal understanding of BPD and applied community-based treatment paradigm; however, critical contextual information about preparations for death was not effectively communicated to treating teams. Complex assessment of acute suicide risk in chronic BPD presents ongoing clinical challenges.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Borderline personality disorder with chronic suicidality
  • Inadequate communication of critical information between family and clinical teams
  • Complexity of suicide risk assessment in BPD
  • Community-based treatment paradigm with minimal necessary intervention policy
  • Discharge without firm follow-up arrangements or medications
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —