Finding into death of Peter James
Deceased
PETER STARR JAMES
Demographics
74y, male
Date of death
2011-02-01
Finding date
2011-08-25
Cause of death
Severe head injury as a result of a motor vehicle incident (passenger)
AI-generated summary
A 74-year-old man died from severe head injury sustained as a front-seat passenger in a motor vehicle collision on the Hume Freeway. His wife was driving when the vehicle veered left onto the rumble strip, she overcorrected, and the car rolled into a culvert and struck a tree. The deceased was wearing a seatbelt and sleeping at the time. Road conditions were dry and the vehicle was mechanically sound. The coroner identified this high-accident section of freeway as problematic and recommended safety improvements including wire rope fencing and fatigue warning signs. This case highlights the importance of road safety infrastructure and driver fatigue awareness during long journeys.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Contributing factors
- Driver correction and overcorrection after vehicle veered onto rumble strip
- High accident rate section of Hume Freeway
- Inadequate road safety infrastructure at the collision site
Coroner's recommendations
- Brifen wire rope safety fences to be erected along the section of Hume Freeway between the 231 and 234 kilometre posts
- Overhead electronic sign warning of 'fatigue risk ahead' to be erected on the approach to this section of the freeway
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —