Finding into death of Christine Mary Humphrey
Deceased
Christine Mary Humphrey
Demographics
44y, female
Date of death
2009-10-10
Finding date
2011-02-08
Cause of death
Chest and abdominal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision (driver)
AI-generated summary
Christine Humphrey, age 44, died from chest and abdominal injuries sustained in a head-on motor vehicle collision on the Eastern Freeway near Melbourne on 10 October 2009. She drove her vehicle the wrong way up a freeway exit ramp into oncoming traffic at approximately 127 kph, colliding with a vehicle driven by Wei Chang, who died instantly. Toxicology showed her blood alcohol level was 0.29 g/100mL, over five times the legal driving limit, rendering her incapable of proper vehicle control or judgment. The coroner found she failed to observe 'no entry' and 'wrong way' signposting due to alcohol impairment and proceeded along the ramp at excessive speed. Although Ms Humphrey had a history of depression, the coroner ruled out suicidal intent based on her apparent good mood in recent times. The death was directly attributable to impaired driving caused by excessive alcohol consumption.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Excessive alcohol consumption (blood alcohol level 0.29 g/100mL, over 5 times legal limit)
- Impaired judgment due to alcohol intoxication
- Failure to observe 'no entry' sign at freeway exit ramp
- Failure to observe 'wrong way' warning signposting
- Excessive speed (approximately 127 kph in 100 kph zone)
- Driving the wrong way on freeway
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —