Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of James Thomas Smith

Deceased

James Thomas Smith

Demographics

45y, male

Date of death

2008-01-23

Finding date

2011-11-02

Cause of death

single penetrating stab wound to the chest

AI-generated summary

James Smith, a 45-year-old man with a history of violence and alcohol use, died from a penetrating stab wound to the chest sustained during an altercation with his partner Jacqui Holmes in January 2008. The incident occurred weeks after a family violence intervention order was made following his assault on Jacqui in November 2007. Critical system failures included: failure to fax the mandatory L17 family violence risk assessment form to the support service (confusion over responsibility), insufficient communication to Jacqui regarding conditions of the intervention order, inadequate supervision of the referral process by police management, and lack of referrals for the perpetrator to behaviour change programs. While Jacqui acted in self-defence, the coroner identified systemic gaps in family violence response protocols that should have been followed more thoroughly, acknowledging that patience and multiple interventions are needed in intimate partner violence cases.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • alcohol intoxication (blood alcohol 0.16 g/100ml, vitreous 0.19 g/100ml)
  • failure to fax L17 family violence risk assessment form to support service
  • confusion over police responsibility for completing referral process
  • inadequate supervision of referral procedures by police management
  • insufficient communication to victim regarding intervention order conditions
  • lack of referral for perpetrator to behaviour change programs
  • victim's lack of awareness of contact prohibition
  • victim's decision to return to violent partner after initial separation
  • history of escalating intimate partner violence

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Chief Commissioner of Police to review Victoria Police Manual provisions requiring completion and forwarding of the Family Violence Risk Assessment and Management Report (L17) to ensure clear instructions on which member is responsible for sending the form to relevant support services
  2. Chief Commissioner of Police to review current procedures to ensure conditions and outcomes of Family Violence Intervention Order applications are conveyed in timely, effective and consistent manner to affected family members
  3. Secretary to the Department of Justice to consider extending the applicant support worker program to each Magistrates' Court in Victoria dealing with Family Violence Intervention Order applications
  4. Chief Executive Officer of Magistrates' Court of Victoria to review applicant support worker system of recording information to ensure appropriate records of contact with affected family members at court
  5. Chief Executive Officer of Magistrates' Court of Victoria to develop training standard and internal supervision process for applicant support workers in risk assessment, safety planning and service referral
  6. Development of written materials regarding family violence dynamics and local support service contacts for distribution by applicant support workers
  7. Establishment of ongoing program evaluation system for applicant support worker program incorporating feedback from workers
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —