Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Michael Peysack

Deceased

Michael Peysack

Demographics

69y, male

Coroner

Deputy State Coroner Paresa Spanos

Date of death

2007-09-01

Finding date

2011-02-25

Cause of death

Head injury post-collapse secondary to ventricular tachycardia due to ischaemic cardiomyopathy

AI-generated summary

Mr Peysack, a 69-year-old with complex cardiac disease on Warfarin, collapsed at work with witnessed loss of consciousness and occipital laceration. Despite meeting criteria for urgent head CT imaging (age >65, head injury, loss of consciousness, anticoagulation), this was not performed in the Emergency Department due to failure to recognize and act upon the combination of risk factors. Information about the head injury was progressively omitted through verbal handovers and specialist compartmentalization focused on cardiac issues. He deteriorated rapidly on the ward 36 hours later with intracranial haemorrhage requiring emergency craniotomy. Expert evidence indicates early CT imaging would likely have identified subdural haematoma amenable to treatment, and with stable cardiac status he would probably have survived neurosurgical intervention. The death was preventable and highlights critical gaps in holistic assessment, reliance on incomplete verbal handovers, and failure to consult written medical records.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinecardiologyneurosurgerynephrologyintensive care

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystem

Drugs involved

warfarinamiodaroneparacetamolibuprofendigoxinatorvastatinirbesartan

Clinical conditions

ischaemic cardiomyopathyventricular tachycardiahead injurysubdural haematomaintracranial haemorrhagecoronary artery diseaseatrial fibrillationchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasedialysis-dependent renal failuremyocardial infarction

Procedures

CT imaging of headcraniotomyhaematoma evacuation and drainageintubationhaemodialysisdefibrillator interrogation

Contributing factors

  • Failure to perform urgent CT head imaging despite meeting protocol criteria
  • Lack of awareness or recognition of head injury and anticoagulation risk by treating clinicians
  • Progressive omission of head injury information through multiple handovers and specialist assessments
  • Compartmentalized specialist assessment rather than holistic patient review
  • Reliance on incomplete verbal handovers rather than consultation of medical records
  • Failure to recognize persistent headache as warning sign of intracranial pathology
  • Tacit assumption that admission under cardiology implied patient was otherwise well
  • Prolonged Emergency Department stay with ineffective information communication

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Southern Health enhance electronic medical records in Emergency Department to reinforce 'Adult Head Injury Request' protocol by requiring mandatory consideration where key factors present (head strike or injury and anticoagulation therapy)
  2. Southern Health consider expanding electronic records to all departments to facilitate accessibility and encourage treating clinicians to consult patient medical records to inform treatment
  3. Southern Health take steps to encourage specialist medical staff to make holistic assessment of patient and require full reassessment of patient upon admission to specialist unit
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.