Coronial
VIChome

Finding into death of Joanne Elizabeth Howell

Deceased

JOANNE ELIZABETH HOWELL

Demographics

51y, female

Date of death

2007-04-21

Finding date

2011-08-26

Cause of death

head injury in a woman with evidence of ligature strangulation

AI-generated summary

Joanne Elizabeth Howell, a 51-year-old woman, died on 21 April 2007 from head injury sustained in conjunction with ligature strangulation. The coroner found on the balance of probabilities that the deceased's de facto partner, Mr Paul Charlton, caused or contributed to her death. The relationship had become volatile with frequent arguments; on the morning of her death, Ms Howell asked Mr Charlton to move out within one month. Evidence indicated she expressed fear of his anger. A loud thud was heard in her unit between 9.00-9.30pm. The coroner noted the narrow window of opportunity for an unidentified third party to commit the crime and the absence of any evidence of theft or struggle, favouring the conclusion that the fatal injuries resulted from the breakdown of the relationship with Mr Charlton. The finding emphasises the seriousness of domestic relationship breakdown and associated risks.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Drugs involved

Contributing factors

  • volatile domestic relationship
  • relationship breakdown on day of death
  • fear of partner's anger expressed before death
  • ligature strangulation applied while deceased was still alive
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —