Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Marlene Kenny

Deceased

MARLENE KENNY

Demographics

64y, female

Coroner

Deputy State Coroner Iain West

Date of death

2007-01-11

Finding date

2011-07-29

Cause of death

Bilateral pulmonary embolism with left middle cerebral artery/posterior cerebral artery stroke and ST elevation AMI

AI-generated summary

Marlene Kenny, 64, presented to Orbost Hospital on 8 January 2007 with chest tightness, breathing difficulties and low oxygen saturation (83-86%). A doctor diagnosed panic attack and discharged her without investigation. She re-presented next day with neurological symptoms (arm weakness, slurred speech) suspicious for TIA. The hospital failed to recognise she had a paradoxical stroke caused by a patent foramen ovale allowing a blood clot to cross from right to left circulation. Transfer to tertiary care was delayed over 9 hours due to poor communication between hospital and ambulance services about clinical urgency, ineffective bed coordination, and adverse weather. She deteriorated, suffered myocardial infarction, and died from bilateral pulmonary embolism complicated by stroke. Key failures: initial hypoxia not investigated; complexity not recognised on readmission; escalation inadequately documented; transfer delayed by communication breakdown and transport resource constraints. Earlier recognition of complexity and expedited transfer would have significantly enhanced her prospects.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinegeneral practiceneurologycardiologyintensive care

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationdelaysystem

Drugs involved

diazepamsotololalprazolamsimvastin

Clinical conditions

panic attack (misdiagnosis)hypoxiatransient ischaemic attackstrokeparadoxical strokepatent foramen ovaleacute myocardial infarctionpulmonary embolism

Procedures

electrocardiogramchest X-rayCT brain scanCT angiogram

Contributing factors

  • Initial presentation misdiagnosed as panic attack without investigation of hypoxia
  • Hypoxia not investigated; no chest X-ray or senior assessment
  • Patient discharged without documented medical plan or follow-up review
  • ECG performed but not adequately interpreted
  • Significance of admission hypoxia on second presentation not recognised
  • Limited documentation of medical and nursing assessments on second presentation
  • Complexity of presentation not recognised - paradoxical stroke from patent foramen ovale with right-to-left shunt not suspected
  • Failure to escalate for early transfer while patient stable
  • Transfer delayed over 9 hours due to poor communication between hospital and ambulance services
  • Initial transfer request marked 'routine' rather than 'time critical' despite deteriorating condition
  • RAV controller did not clarify clinical significance of 'another episode'
  • RAV did not notify hospital of likely delays in air transport
  • Limited air ambulance resources due to other urgent cases and bushfires
  • Ineffective bed coordination requiring multiple phone calls and significant time
  • Environmental factors: major bushfires affecting air transport visibility
  • Geographic isolation: 400km from nearest tertiary centre

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Develop and implement guidelines for reportable observations and include as prompts on observation charts
  2. Develop key performance indicators on completion of medical documentation reportable to Director of Medical Services and Clinical Risk Review Committee
  3. Develop key performance indicators on completion of nursing documentation reportable to Director of Nursing and Clinical Risk Review Committee
  4. Develop and implement guidelines for recall or follow-up of patients discharged without medical review
  5. Hospital, RAV and AAV services work collaboratively to develop and implement standardized structured clinical handover process including options for providing information on maximum hours transfer can take and maximum time patient can be outside hospital
  6. Systems to provide transferring agency with expected timeframe for transfer and notify of changes in condition or expected timeframes
  7. Develop new classification guideline for transfer requests with expanded options beyond routine and time critical
  8. RAV review operations centre guidelines for contingency planning for transport arrangements
  9. RAV review operations centre policies and procedures regarding requesting aircraft for routine and time critical requests
  10. RAV develop and implement process to audit clinical decision making in operations centre
  11. Hospital develop guidelines for optimum time to transfer high risk patients considering location and time to activate resources
  12. Implement evidence-based risk screening tool for management and transfer of patients with transient ischaemic attacks
  13. Review Medical Officer orientation program to include circumstances where they may have to escort patients and time-effective means of arranging beds in higher level facilities
  14. Amend neurological observation charts to include area for recording oxygen saturations and oxygen delivery
  15. Develop and implement stroke/transient ischaemic attack care pathway
  16. Department of Human Services consider developing process for facilities to determine bed availability through central point for urgent transfers
  17. Hospital and ambulance service staff be reminded of importance of patients, families and carers receiving information and support throughout care delivery
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.