Coronial
VICcommunity

Finding into death of Kelvin Lea Swab

Deceased

KELVIN LEA SWAB

Demographics

34y, male

Date of death

2008-10-12

Finding date

2010-06-11

Cause of death

Hanging

AI-generated summary

Mr Kelvin Swab, a 34-year-old with chronic mental illness including borderline personality disorder and longstanding suicidal ideation, died by hanging on 12 October 2008, shortly after discharge from inpatient psychiatric care. He was assessed on 3 October and 10 October 2008 by Dr R. and RPN Jones at Waverley Clinic (Eastern Health) and documented as not currently suicidal with improved mood. The coroner found the medical management reasonable and appropriate. However, the case illustrates clinical challenges: Dr R. later reflected that providing specific follow-up dates rather than vague "next week" contact might have helped address abandonment fears in borderline personality disorder. Risk assessment at a single timepoint may not predict subsequent behaviour over days, and suicidal intent can escalate unpredictably. The importance of specific, structured follow-up arrangements in vulnerable patients is highlighted.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Borderline personality disorder
  • chronic suicidal ideation and self-harm behaviour
  • recent service transfer from Southern Health to Eastern Health
  • brief period of engagement with Waverley Clinic (9 days from first assessment)
  • vague follow-up arrangement ('next week') rather than specific date/time
  • possible perception of abandonment given his diagnosis
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —