Coronial
VICcommunity

Finding into death of Luke Axente Jurj

Deceased

Luke Axente Jurj

Demographics

23y, male

Date of death

2007-10-01

Finding date

2010-05-24

Cause of death

Injuries sustained in a fall from a height

AI-generated summary

Luke Jurj, a 23-year-old man, died from injuries sustained in a fall from the Westgate Bridge after jumping 30 metres. He had been experiencing depression since returning from Japan 7 weeks prior and had contacted his mother to inform her of suicidal intent. Police attended promptly after multiple calls from motorists. During the intervention, whilst the deceased was holding the safety rail, Senior Constable Kirwan attempted to grab his arm to prevent the fall. The deceased thrashed, broke free, and jumped backward off the bridge. Toxicology detected methamphetamine, amphetamine, MDMA and MDA. The coroner commended the attending police for their exemplary conduct and extraordinary courage and compassion in an impossible situation. The finding emphasises that no person other than the deceased bears responsibility for his decision to commit suicide.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Depression following return from Japan
  • Use of illicit drugs (methamphetamine, amphetamine, MDMA, MDA)
  • Suicidal intent

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Permanent public safety barriers should be constructed on the Westgate Bridge
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —