Finding into death of Mohamed Ali Chaouk
Deceased
Mohamed Ali Chaouk
Demographics
30y, male
Date of death
2005-04-05
Finding date
2010-04-23
Cause of death
Gunshot wounds to chest and abdomen
AI-generated summary
Mohamed Ali Chaouk, aged 30, was fatally shot during a forced police entry to his home in Brooklyn, Victoria on 5 April 2005. Police executed search warrants and arrests related to organised crime investigations. When SOG officers ascended the stairs, the deceased confronted them with a samurai sword, striking Operator 52 on the forearm. Both Operator 52 and Operator 49 discharged firearms, with Operator 52 firing three shots that proved fatal. The coroner found the shooting was in self-defence, with officers acting lawfully in response to armed threat. The coroner examined whether operational decisions—including forced entry, stairwell assault tactics, and communication methods—were appropriate and concluded they were justified by police protocols and threat assessment. The death, while tragic, was not found to be preventable given the circumstances.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Contributing factors
- Deceased armed himself with samurai sword during police entry
- Deceased struck police officer causing confrontation
- Deceased appeared not to comply with police commands
- Narrow confined staircase limiting tactical options
Coroner's recommendations
- Continue to treat forced entry as a last resort option by police
- Maintain sound decision-making processes for SOG deployment with articulated criteria and exigency assessment
- Retain and preserve critical evidence items (gloves and overalls worn during confrontations) for forensic examination and inquest
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —