Coronial
TAShome

Coroner's Finding: de-identified JW

Deceased

JW

Demographics

66y, male

Date of death

2023-10-15

Finding date

2026-04-28

Cause of death

blood loss (exsanguination) due to being mauled by dog

AI-generated summary

JW, 66 years old, died on 15 October 2023 from exsanguination following a dog attack by his family's Rottweiler, Rubin, at their home in Allens Rivulet, Tasmania. In September 2023, Rubin attacked JW after he fell on the dog while walking, causing severe injuries requiring hospitalization and surgical repair. Following this incident, an experienced dog trainer explicitly advised that Rubin could attack again and should be regarded as dangerous. Despite this clear warning, JW and XT decided against euthanizing Rubin. On 15 October, JW (with elevated blood alcohol levels exceeding 0.15g/100ml) fell on Rubin in the garden at night, triggering a fatal attack. Rubin inflicted severe lacerations exposing deep muscle and blood vessels resulting in exsanguination. The coroner found that responsible dog ownership would have required euthanization of Rubin after the September incident to prevent further risk, making the death potentially preventable. No formal recommendations were made.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Drugs involved

Contributing factors

  • dog attack by Rottweiler (Rubin)
  • JW falling on the dog
  • prior trauma to dog from July 2022 attack by another dog
  • alcohol intoxication (blood alcohol content exceeded 0.15g/100ml)
  • decision not to euthanize Rubin after September 2023 attack despite explicit warnings of dangerous behaviour
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —