Coronial
TASother

Coroner's Finding: Seabourne, Bailey Matthew Grant

Deceased

Bailey Matthew Grant Seabourne

Demographics

16y, male

Date of death

2022-05-09

Finding date

2025-03-28

Cause of death

Head and neck injuries sustained as a result of being ejected from a motor vehicle which rolled after travelling at speed

AI-generated summary

Bailey Matthew Grant Seabourne, 16 years old, died from head and neck injuries sustained when ejected from a motor vehicle that rolled after the driver lost control while attempting to drift around a bend at excessive speed. The driver was travelling at least 102 km/h through a bend with a 65 km/h advisory speed limit, contrary to his P1 licence conditions which restricted peer passengers. Bailey was unrestrained—his seatbelt was jammed and inoperable. He was ejected 7.8 metres from the vehicle and was deceased on arrival of emergency services. The accident was entirely preventable through appropriate speed management and seatbelt use. This case emphasises the critical importance of seatbelt maintenance and function checks, young driver supervision, and peer passenger restrictions.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Driver travelling at excessive speed (102 km/h or greater) through a bend with 65 km/h advisory speed limit
  • Driver attempting to drift vehicle around bend
  • Loss of control when rear tyre entered gravel verge
  • Deceased unrestrained by seatbelt due to jammed and inoperable seatbelt
  • Driver breached P1 licence conditions by carrying four peer passengers instead of maximum one
  • Deceased did not exit vehicle despite observing dangerous driving behaviour during earlier stops
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —