Coroner's Finding: de-identified PD
Deceased
PD
Demographics
41y, male
Date of death
2023-08-22
Finding date
2025-07-04
Cause of death
Chest and limb injuries resulting from deliberately jumping from the Tasman Bridge with the intention of ending his life
AI-generated summary
A 41-year-old male with schizophrenia, depression, and PTSD died by suicide by jumping from the Tasman Bridge. He had a long history of methamphetamine use and psychotic episodes, with multiple involuntary mental health admissions. He disengaged from community mental health services in May 2023, stating they could not help him. In the week before his death, he gave away possessions and asked his father about heaven. He texted his partner seeking forgiveness on the morning of his death. The coroner found the death could not have been reasonably prevented due to the severity of his condition and substance use. The finding emphasizes that structural modifications to the bridge's safety barriers remain the key preventive measure, with 22 deaths from the bridge between 2016-2024 despite previous coronial recommendations.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- schizophrenia
- depression
- post-traumatic stress disorder
- methamphetamine use
- disengagement from community mental health services
- suicidal ideation
- lack of structural safety barriers on the Tasman Bridge
Coroner's recommendations
- The government urgently implement structural modifications to the Tasman Bridge with a key aim of eliminating suicides at the Tasman Bridge
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —