Coroner's Finding: Marshall, Benjamin Laurence - Ruling on scope of Inquest
Deceased
Benjamin Laurence Marshall
Demographics
male
Date of death
2019-10
Finding date
2024-03-22
Cause of death
suicide
AI-generated summary
Benjamin Laurence Marshall, a former Royal Australian Navy sailor, died by apparent suicide in October 2019. This coronial ruling addresses the scope of the inquest rather than final findings. The coroner examined whether his military service, discharge process, mental health care by the ADF, and transition support were adequate. Key issues included recruitment suitability, retention appropriateness despite mental health impacts, psychiatric conditions leading to medical discharge, and assistance during transition to civilian life. The coroner declined to expand scope to review previous ADF suicide recommendations or examine Tasmanian mental health treatment in detail, considering such expansion a 'roving commission' beyond appropriate coronial jurisdiction. The inquest focuses on ADF-related factors rather than post-discharge civilian care, with refined scope finalised to examine transition assistance from defence organisations and support services.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
psychiatryparamedicineoccupational and environmental health
Clinical conditions
psychiatric disorder requiring medical discharge
Contributing factors
military service between 2010 and 2017
accepted psychiatric condition requiring medical discharge
adequacy of mental health care provided by ADF
discharge and transition process management
support and assistance during transition to civilian life
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.