left subdural haematoma resulting from head injury due to fall from standing
AI-generated summary
An 84-year-old woman suffered a fatal head injury after slipping on steps at a café in Stanley, Tasmania on 20 October 2021, resulting in a left subdural haematoma. She was appropriately transported to neurosurgical facilities and underwent emergency evacuation of the haematoma, but died 8 days later. The coroner found her prior fall in August 2021 was thoroughly assessed with appropriate clinical follow-up, and did not warrant additional preventive interventions. The delay in surgery (initially scheduled for 25 October, advanced to 22 October due to deterioration) was justified given the need to manage her aspirin use before surgery and the severity of her injury. Post-operative seizures and infarcts were recognised complications. The case highlights appropriate trauma management and neurosurgical care, with the only recommendation concerning improved hazard signage at the café premises.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
neurosurgeryemergency medicinegeneral practicetrauma surgery
CT scan of brainneurosurgical evacuation of subdural haematomachest X-ray
Contributing factors
slip/trip on steps in café
age and reduced physiological reserve
aspirin use (anticoagulant effect)
inadequate hazard warning signage
Coroner's recommendations
Erect much larger, bold and distinctive warning signs in both directions at the steps in Touchwood Cottages Gallery and Café to improve visibility and distinguish from background surfaces
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.