Coroner's Finding: Williams, Stewart
Deceased
Stewart Williams
Demographics
54y, male
Date of death
2019-03-02
Finding date
2023-11-17
Cause of death
Hypoxic/ischaemic brain damage caused by blood loss and airway obstruction due to facial fractures from blunt force injury (assault); inadequate medical treatment contributed to death
AI-generated summary
A 54-year-old male was assaulted in a nightclub with a single punch causing orbital and facial fractures and posterior epistaxis. He presented to the Royal Hobart Hospital ED with active bleeding. Critical deficits in his emergency treatment included: failure to recognise hypovolaemic shock by 9.30am (four hours after arrival); lack of senior clinician involvement despite ongoing bleeding despite packing and initial interventions; inadequate fluid balance documentation leading to underestimation of blood loss (500ml initially unrecorded); delayed involvement of Oral Maxillofacial specialists; failure to implement posterior nasal packing until 12.27pm despite clinical deterioration; no definitive investigative plan for bleeding source; and premature discontinuation of the MET call at 12.17pm. Expert opinion concluded that with prompt posterior packing or angiography with arterial embolisation, the patient would likely have survived. Instead, he deteriorated into cardiac arrest requiring 97 minutes resuscitation, resulting in hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury from which he could not recover.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Failure to recognise hypovolaemic shock
- Inadequate monitoring
- Poor documentation of fluid balance and blood loss
- Delayed specialist consultation
- Failure to implement appropriate haemorrhage control measures
- Delayed posterior nasal packing
- Inadequate vascular access
- No definitive plan to investigate bleeding source
- Premature discontinuation of MET response
- Lack of senior clinician involvement in decision-making
- No early consideration of angiography or arterial embolisation
Coroner's recommendations
- RHH ED to initiate measures to improve fluid balance documentation, including review of current processes, raising awareness amongst ED nursing staff and auditing fluid balance charts
- RHH Medical Emergency Response (MET and Code Blue) THS Protocol to be revised to give prominence to instruction for escalation to consultant level of any patient who has triggered two MET calls criteria within 24 hours
- Education package to be included in Tier 2 Mandatory Education, Training and Assessment protocol for all relevant THS South clinical staff regarding escalation process for patients triggering two MET call criteria within 24 hours
- Actions to raise awareness of clinical staff within ICU and ED regarding importance and clinical accountability for Bedside Clinical Handover requirements and documentation requirements for deteriorating patients
- Review of Trauma Team Responses Protocol to provide clarity regarding when trauma call can be activated for patients in ED, particularly relating to patients requiring blood transfusion within four hours of presentation
- RHH to review management protocols for patients suffering facial trauma with ongoing bleeding, including inclusion of senior clinicians, definitive plan to investigate further bleeding, and focusing on airway assessment and cardiovascular stability
- RHH to review resuscitation protocols for ongoing traumatic haemorrhage
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —