Coronial
TAScommunity

Coroner's Finding: Oates, Adam Grant

Deceased

Adam Grant Oates

Demographics

22y, male

Date of death

2021-07-31

Finding date

2023-03-06

Cause of death

Extensive head injuries sustained in a single vehicle motor accident

AI-generated summary

A 22-year-old male died from extensive head injuries sustained in a single-vehicle crash after consuming alcohol to excess (blood alcohol 0.214 g/100mL, over 4 times the legal limit) and using his phone while driving. He was not wearing a seatbelt. The coroner found that excessive alcohol consumption impaired his judgment, coordination, and reaction time, leading to loss of control on a curve. While a seatbelt would not have guaranteed survival given the severity of impact, it would have significantly reduced the risk of fatal head injuries. Key clinical lesson: alcohol's profound CNS depressant effects on driving ability are dose-dependent; at this concentration, crash risk was approximately 50 times higher than sober driving.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Excessive alcohol consumption (blood alcohol 0.214 g/100mL)
  • Impaired judgment, coordination, and reaction time due to alcohol
  • Use of mobile phone while driving
  • Harsh right-hand steering input causing loss of vehicle control
  • Not wearing a seatbelt
  • Rut in road verge contributing to initial loss of control

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Clarence City Council assess the rut on the northern side of the eastbound lane of Middle Tea Tree Road and repair it if assessment deems it necessary
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —