carbon monoxide intoxication due to voluntary and intentional inhalation of exhaust from a petrol generator
AI-generated summary
A 27-year-old woman with a lengthy history of depression, anxiety, and previous suicide attempts died by carbon monoxide poisoning. She was referred to mental health crisis services on 4 July 2020 with documented suicidal ideation. Despite the referral and her proactive contact requesting psychological support, she was never seen by any mental health clinician. Her case was discussed at five multidisciplinary team meetings over 18 days, transferred between teams, and she was discharged without ever receiving direct care. The coroner found she was 'very poorly served' by mental health services at a time she plainly needed support, highlighting critical failures in establishing therapeutic relationships and providing timely intervention.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
failure to establish therapeutic contact with patient despite referral
failure to provide direct clinical care despite documented high-risk suicidal ideation
case discussed multiple times at team meetings but no direct intervention undertaken
discharge from mental health service without ever being seen by a clinician
poor communication and care coordination between CATT teams
lack of capacity in crisis assessment service to return patient's calls
patient's previous suicide attempt by carbon monoxide poisoning in 2018 not acted upon
Coroner's recommendations
The coroner endorsed the detailed recommendations from the Tasmanian Health Service's Final Root Cause Analysis Report but stated the findings were comprehensive and clear, without detailing specific recommendations in the coronial finding itself
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —