Coronial
TASother

Coroner's Finding: Conley, Graham Rex

Deceased

Graham Rex Conley

Demographics

75y, male

Date of death

2022-04-21

Finding date

2023-10-25

Cause of death

blunt trauma of the thorax sustained in a single motor vehicle crash

AI-generated summary

A 75-year-old male died from blunt thoracic trauma sustained in a single-vehicle motor crash. He was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the collision with a power pole. The coroner found that if a seatbelt had been worn, he would more likely have survived. Advanced natural heart, lung, and brain disease may have precipitated the vehicle leaving the road. No alcohol or drugs were detected. The vehicle had minor deficiencies unrelated to the crash. The coroner emphasised that seatbelt use is compulsory in Tasmania for over 50 years, yet preventable deaths continue from non-compliance. Clinical relevance: assessment of fitness to drive in patients with cardiac disease and underlying multi-system pathology.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • not wearing a seatbelt
  • possible cardiac event as precipitating factor
  • advanced natural disease of the heart

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Ongoing community education regarding the importance of seatbelt compliance in Tasmania
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —