Coronial
TASother

Coroner's Finding: Barham, Timothy

Deceased

Timothy Gerard Barham

Demographics

62y, male

Date of death

2022-02-24

Finding date

2023-02-21

Cause of death

Multiple injuries sustained in a single motor vehicle crash

AI-generated summary

A 62-year-old male died from multiple injuries sustained in a single-vehicle motor crash on a wet road. He was driving a Toyota Avalon at excessive speed (exceeding 88 km/h critical curve speed) while negotiating a sweeping left-hand curve on wet bitumen in wet weather conditions. The vehicle lost traction, entered an uncontrolled spin, and collided with a large pine tree at approximately 80 km/h. Contributing factors included failure to reduce speed despite a 65 km/h advisory sign, wet road conditions, and insufficient tread depth on the right rear tyre. The coroner found no alcohol or drug involvement. The collision was preventable had the driver obeyed the speed advisory sign and reduced speed appropriately for wet conditions.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Excessive speed for wet road conditions
  • Failure to observe 65 km/h advisory speed sign
  • Wet road surface reducing traction
  • Insufficient tread depth on right rear tyre
  • Loss of vehicle control on sweeping curve
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —