Coroner's Finding: Nguyen, Hanh Thi My and Dang, David Quan Hien SJC
Deceased
Hanh Thi My Nguyen and David Quan Hien Dang
Demographics
unknown
Date of death
2021-07-19
Finding date
2022-03-25
Cause of death
Multiple head, neck, trunk and limb injuries (Ms Nguyen); Multiple head, neck, trunk, spinal and limb injuries (Mr Dang) sustained in a motor vehicle collision
AI-generated summary
Two individuals died in a motor vehicle collision on the Midlands Highway when a Mazda driven by Ms Nguyen crossed into the opposite lane and collided with a prime mover truck. Evidence including dash cam footage suggests Ms Nguyen was looking at her mobile phone immediately before the crash. Toxicological analysis detected methylamphetamine in both deceased's bodies at the time of the collision. The truck driver was uninjured and tested negative for alcohol and drugs. No mechanical defects or adverse road/weather conditions contributed to the crash. The coroner found Ms Nguyen solely responsible, attributing the crash to inattention likely affected by her methylamphetamine consumption. This case highlights the dangers of distracted driving and substance use impairment while driving.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Driver distraction - mobile phone use
- Methylamphetamine consumption affecting driver attention and reaction
- Driver inattention
- Crossing into opposite lane
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —