Coroner's Finding: Geertsema, Darlene Avis
Deceased
Darlene Avis Geertsema
Demographics
30y, female
Date of death
1978-10-23
Finding date
2022-06-10
Cause of death
Injuries inflicted by John Shepherd; pathological cause unable to be determined
AI-generated summary
Darlene Avis Geertsema, aged 30, disappeared from Devonport, Tasmania on 23 October 1978. The inquest concluded she died as a result of injuries inflicted by her intimate partner, John Shepherd, on the evening of her disappearance at their flat. The coroner found Shepherd had a documented history of serious violence against intimate partners, established motive (Geertsema's plans to leave with their children), and was the last person to see her alive. Key clinical/forensic lessons: early intervention in domestic violence relationships; the danger of intimate partner violence escalation; importance of thorough investigation of missing persons where domestic violence is present. Contemporary police investigation in 1978 was hindered by limited protocols for domestic violence cases and failure to interview child witnesses who had direct knowledge of events.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Intimate partner violence and domestic violence
- Consumption of alcohol by perpetrator
- Escalation of conflict over custody of child
- Victim's plans to leave relationship and relocate interstate
- History of violence by perpetrator against multiple intimate partners
- Jealous and possessive behaviour of perpetrator
- Victim's nervousness about confrontation
- Perpetrator's history of alcohol-related aggression
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —