Coroner's Finding: Procter, Wilfred Pearson
Deceased
Wilfred Pearson Procter
Demographics
53y, male
Date of death
1971-01
Finding date
2020-02-03
Cause of death
unable to determine
AI-generated summary
Wilfred Pearson Procter, a 53-year-old man, disappeared from his home in Newnham, Tasmania in January 1971. His remains were discovered in September 2016 at Dilston, approximately 12 km from his residence. DNA testing and forensic anthropology confirmed identity. However, the coroner was unable to determine the cause of death or specific circumstances. Post-mortem trauma to bones suggested possible blunt force injury, but skull fragments were insufficient for definitive analysis. The coroner noted three possibilities: murder (he carried substantial cash), suicide (he exhibited signs of depression following marital separation), or natural death. No evidence supports any single hypothesis. This case highlights the challenges of determining cause of death in skeletal remains and the importance of thorough forensic investigation decades after disappearance.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Contributing factors
- Post-mortem trauma to skeletal remains
- Possible blunt force injury from slasher or bulldozer blade
- Insufficient skull fragments for perimortem trauma assessment
- Possible depression following marital separation
- Known to carry large sums of cash ($12,000-$20,000)
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —